Monday, July 31, 2006

Pitch and Make-up

Wow! A triple-espresso of a publicity coup! Steve Perlman and his team at Contour, the new digital effects company, must be celebrating today's front page troika in The New York Times "Business", Wall Street Journal "Marketplace" (by sub. only) and San Jose Mercury News "Business" sections. That's the good news.

Here's the bad: I bet John Markoff, Nick Wingfield and Dean Takahashi, the premier SF-based tech reporters for The Times , Journal and Merc News, respectively, were none too happy to see each other scooped so prominently on the same story. Of course, I'm only speculating on whether the PR reps for Contour fully disclosed what other outlets intended to coronate the new company. (For their sake, I hope so.)

BTW - When disclosing what else is "in the works" editorially, I would advise against giving a reporter the exact name of the rival publication. Just as the reporter would not want you to disclose his or her editorial plans, you should not reveal the competitor's. Instead, go with "a national daily newspaper," or something that provides enough specificity to satisfactorily avoid any surprises.

Gibson the Greek

As Lindsey Lohan's mother weighs in to defend her party-hardy daughter against a very public tongue-lashing by the top executive on her latest fim, Hollywood is debating just how deep a hole wacko Mel Gibson has dug for himself with his DUI arrest over the weekend.

DUI arrest? Big deal. In today's world, that kind of happenstance might actually elevate one's standing on the celebrity-o-meter. (Think Kate Moss.)

No, it was the venemous anti-Semitic diatribe spewed by Mr. Gibson during his arrest that set off this latest firestorm. As one Hollywood go-to PR guy quipped to The AP:
"It's a nuclear disaster for him," said publicist Michael Levine, who has represented Michael Jackson and Charlton Heston, among others. "I don't see how he can restore himself."
Michael makes a valid point, but for a different time and place. Ten years ago, a heinous story like this would have put the death knell on any public personality's career. Today, however, the fragmented, 24/7 media environment allows a supposed career-ending incident to disappear into a speeding car's rear view mirror as fast as one can say Pee Wee Herman or Jimmy the Greek.

Also, let's not forget the rising tide of anti-Semitism in this country and abroad. Mr. Gibson's remarks will certainly gain traction with the nation's growing amoral majority. As far as Hollywood, if the incendiary "Passion" didn't derail his celebrity stature, who's to say that this will.

 Posted by Picasa

Friday, July 28, 2006

CNBC.com to Stand Alone

While not as high brow as the Always On Summit held at Stanford University this week, the Publicity Club of New York*'s con-fab in the city yesterday drew some 180+ PR pros. The audience came from all walks of the industry -- big and small agencies, financial services firms, media and publishing companies, healthcare providers, universities, entertainment providers, etc. The subject of this distinctly PR 1.0 event: Business TV News.

On the panel sat a handful of the top business news and guest segment decisionmakers for CNBC, CNN "American Morning," Bloomberg TV & Radio, and ABC-TV News. Some of what we heard:
-- ABC's Charlie Herman tell us that 24-hour all news program ABC World News Now has two slots for business news guests (at 9:30am and 4:30pm).
-- Bloomberg's Karen Toulon said that Bloomberg TV takes lots of ("hopefully") live guests. One day she said the network carried some 200 live interviews over its 24-hour programming window. She also relayed how fab the company's new worldwide headquarters is, and that they still serve snacks in the waiting area.
-- CNN "American Morning's" Paul Amin said that he looks for lighter business features in the second half of the four-hour program, and is especially interested in some of the unusual viral marketing campaigns being mounted by established marketers.
-- Finally, Nick Dunn, who came in from CNBC's HQ in leafy Englewood Cliffs, reiterated the business network's policy of being first in terms of guest appearances. (It was he who cancelled at the last moment an appearance by the U.S. Secretary of Treasury after the Secretary's PR reps misled him and had their charge on Fox News Channel before CNBC.)

Nick also let on that this fall CNBC will no longer reside under the MSNBC.com domain. CNBC.com will be born (again?) and stand alone with its own branded web site complete with streaming video and other digital accoutrements to which we've grown accustomed from the digital minds at NBCUni.
For those who attended, thanks for coming. We hope to post the opening remarks on the PCNY website before too long, and you may even see the full event on mediabistro.com.


* This blogger serves as president of PCNY.

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Harvard @ Stanford

I'm off to preside over a panel of business TV news producers at today's Publicity Club of New York luncheon where I expect to gather some fodder for this weblog.

In the interim, be sure to check out Andy Plesser's beet.tv interview with Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes from the Always On Summit taking place this week at Stanford Univ. Also check out the related Q&A with Live World's Peter Friedman in yesterday's WSJ (sub required).

Did you know that thousands of enterprises are using Facebook as a platform for their own communities? BTW, Chris stayed on at Harvard to earn his degree this spring.

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

Woody's Lament

 Who can blame Woody Allen for being depressed? After all, the enigmatic and prolific filmmaker must withstand the monotony of back-to-back-to-back interviews for yet another of his yearly rights-of-passage. (It could be worse. He's camped out in a suite at The Mark Hotel in NYC.)

There was a time when Mr. Allen didn't avail himself to a single ink-stained wretch, let alone a media junket. That unavailability, coupled with some pretty darn good creative output, elevated Mr. Allen to an altogether higher level of fame on the celebrity-o-meter. Of course, the Mia and Soon-Yi saga, not to mention Jean Doumanian, took him down more than a few notches.

So why is he playing the media junket game now? And why would he use the opportunity to share with prospective filmgoers his utter state of depression? (After all, aren't we all depressed by the state of the nation.)

If you're Mr. Allen's PR consigliere, would you have the temerity to "message" him so that his new film stands a chance of realizing a profit? If CEOs and world leaders sit through communications training sessions to "command and control" the tenor if not substance of the end editorial product, what's with the Hollywood (yes, Hollywood) elite? Mr. Allen, get thee to an orgasmatron! (Oh, by the way, Mr. Allen's new film is titled "Scoop.")

 Posted by Picasa

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Pay-Per-Post

 My friend and sometimes collaborator Andy Plesser is in northern CA to capture for his burgeoning beet.tv vlog sound bites from a who's who of new media pundits and pontificators gathered at Tony Perkins' Always On Summit, which starts this evening at Stanford University.

No doubt the virility and virality of online digital video, as a marketing vehicle, will continue to capture much of the conversation. From a PR industry perspective, we're at a crossroads. Does commercially produced or commercially incented, but consumer-generated (and syndicated) video fall into the PR pro's playbook, or will the Crispin Porters and specialized video boutiques of the world capture the lion's share of this exploding category?

Business Week weighs in with a piece that reports on the trend of some video hosting sites charging for the right to post video. This follows the news of the big entertainment content providers striking strategic partnerships with the more dominant sites as a means to whet TV (or IPTV) viewers' appetites for their full fall fare.

It begs the question: which video submissions require payment to their host and which do not. Which are in the advertiser's domain and which fall into PR? I wonder what would happen if local broadcast TV news directors charged outside video producers a fee for to air their footage on the local newscast? The line between advertising and PR content blurs.

 Posted by Picasa

Monday, July 24, 2006

Clever Deception

(Sure sounds like a Michael Douglas or Richard Gere movie.) Some months ago, Weber-Shandwick's Robert Ricci spoke out against deceptive viral and word-of-mouth marketing tactics. This blog also has weighed in on the subject from time to time.

In fact, I recently joined PR bloggers Paull Young/Trevor Cook's effort to end the nefarious industry practice known as astroturfing. Others lent their names to the movement, including Cluetrain Manifesto co-author David Weinberger.

Last week, we learned of a hugely successful viral marketing campaign to promote a Court TV program. The promotion combined outdoor advertising and a weblog written by someone named "Emily."
"The billboard created interest... A booking agent from 'Good Morning America' sent an e-mail to Emily inviting her on the show. British Glamour wanted to make her the subject of a feature article..."
After some digging, it was learned that there is no Emily and the entire effort was fabricated to attain the elusive Holy Grail of marketing -- viral buzz. For some, or rather, many in our line of work, the Court TV ploy will be viewed as a grand success.
"The good news is that even after the ruse was discovered, people visited the Emily blog, pushing it to one million hits by the end of Thursday...Court TV’s marketing group liked the idea so much that they made it a large part of the campaign."
For others (like me), it's just one big, admittedly clever, consumer deception.

Friday, July 21, 2006

Rafat Speaks to Us...On His Terms

When the founding editor of perhaps the most influential source of news about digital content offers us PR types some pointers on contacting him, I'd suggest paying attention. Rafat Ali of paidcontent.org just posted this item to his website:
Note To PR People About Calling & Attachments [by Rafat]

Note to PR people: when you send us a release or info by e-mail, we have it. If we don't use it, then we won't use it. Calling up and following on it will not change our minds...so refrain from it. Also, another pet peeve: don't send release as PDF/Word attachments...we will not open it. Either cut-paste, or better still, send a link to the online version.
Of course, some enterprising fellow chimed in with a comment trying to sell Rafat his wares.
"...Just thought our service might help deal with the above problem..."
I bet Rafat, Staci and the gang can't wait to sign up.

Creative Advertising

We recently regurgitated news of the first live commercial on the New York (or any?) stage. Unusually, the live ad's context -- not its content -- generated a fair share of editorial buzz.

Another posting on this blog looked at the deal a golf ball manufacturer struck with the Russian Space Agency wherein some astronauts would tee-off its product in space. That too generated a good share of media coverage, though the fate of the presumed world's longest tee shot remained up in the air when we last checked.

This week, we learned of a pair of contextually-driven advertising initiatives, both of which merit inclusion in the "ads that make news" category. The first involves CBS's publicity ploy to promote its new fall programming on the shells of 35 million eggs. Instead of walking on eggshells, the Tiffany network has chosen to do its talking on eggshells.

The second effort involves US Airways and its announcement offering less-than-squeamish advertisers space on the outside of its barf bags.
"The ads could be for anti-motion sickness medications or other products immediately on the mind of someone who reaches for one of the bags. But Gee said US Airways will look for a wide range of product advertisements to put on its bags."
Here's what I recommend to create some real promotional synergy: serve US Airways' passengers the CBS eggs raw, which will prompt the deployment of the billboarded barf bag. It's a win-win situation guaranteed to generate gobs of publicity, among other things.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

The Camp Social

If you ever went to summer camp, you likely remember the boy-girl socials. It worked like this: the campers were herded into a large social hall (with wood plank floors, no doubt.) The canned music blared as the girls immediately gravitated to one end of the cavernous space, the boys to the other.

For a half hour or so, furtive glances were exchanged across the vast, seemingly impenetrable void that separated them. Suddenly, a couple of the more brazen, i.e., "cooler" campers tentatively (no one was that cool) waded across the room to request a dance of his or her carefully scoped-out partner. God forbid if the overture was rejected!

Following PRWeek.com editor Keith O'Brien's lead in capturing (reg required) some new media pros' predictions for the second half of the year, Andy Lark gave us his take on new media trends to tune-in to. One of his primary take-aways: pay heed to social networks, communities and "conversationalists." (We sure could have used a few of the latter back at the social hall.)
"Trend: Communities and their citizen editors reassembling the fragmented media and conversation space creating powerful micro channels to which millions flock."
In his posting, Andy links to joga.com, a social network for soccer enthusiasts created jointly by Nike and Google. How smart is that! Late yesterday Newsweek posted a piece wherein we learn about Essembly, a young, thinking-person's online community that offers lively debate, but more interestingly, rates members based on their social or political compatibility. So here you have an intellectual forum that facilitates social interaction based on one's politics.

We all know that much of the success of Facebook and MySpace is driven by the (other) "S" in Social Media. I suspect Second Life also derives some of its juice through this all-too-natural means.

Nonetheless, the Joga.com and Essembly examples further point to the huge opportunity (for PR pros) to help clients build viable social networks not solely driven by the prospect of hooking up. It's not just partnering with one of the established social networks, but it's having the technical and strategic wherewithal to coalesce their clients' constituents into a custom online community built around a shared interest or passion germane to the client's business. If our industry doesn't make the move across the social hall to own this conversation tool, others certainly will.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

A Tail of One City

In yesterday's post, we linked to a New York Sun story wherein the ebullient head of a global New York agency touted the firm's success with blogging, social media and other conversation-building digital tools.
"We've increased our income by 28% in the last two years," Mr. Edelman said. "We argue that if public relations is 4% of a corporation's budget it ought to be 5%. This is where companies have to spend money, and they are getting the message."
On the flip side of the PR coin, today we link to a New York Post story featuring the head of another New York agency touting his firm's success providing more traditional PR services.
"'Our business is more active than ever," said Howard J. Rubenstein, who founded Rubenstein Associates in 1954. "We continue to compete regionally and nationally and this expansion reflects the growth of our business.' His roster includes such clients as News Corp. (which owns The Post), the New York Yankees, the Tribeca Film Festival, Amazon, Time magazine, Paramount Pictures, Silverstein Properties and Tishman Speyer Properties."
So Peter, what's your point? The point is that the PR industry -- in its many forms -- is enjoying robust growth. I'm just having a hard time reconciling what's driving it: the work of exuberant new media practitioners or the tried and true, meat & potatoes work of old media practitioners. We may just have to admit that the client tail is long enough to nourish and sustain both.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Blog Seeding

Edelman's Derek Creevey must be working overtime. The PR man for the PR firm no doubt had a hand in Brian Steinberg's recent WSJ profile of the firm's namesake CEO. Today, we open (New York Post-wannabe) the New York Sun to find Richard waxing poetic on blogging strategy and of course, the success of his firm.

Of particular interest to me were his comments on blog-seeding (or blog relations). This is an area that's caused some controversy for the firm (and industry), and one that merits greater attention since bloggers generally operate by a different rule set than traditional journalists. (Some say they have no rules.)

As PR pros, we often struggle with how best to engage a blogger, and why (and when) is it necessary to do so?
"Certain blogs are read by reporters in the mainstream media, and then they call the client to do a story, and that's how publicity is obtained," Mr. Edelman said.
(Is it not "publicity" until it reaches the mainstream media?)

While many in our professions are trying to cajole clients to embrace blogging (for better or worse), use social media networks, consider SEM/SEO, create and syndicate digital video, produce podcasts, and digitally optimize their news releases, etc., the issue of how best to efficiently "converse" with a blogger to influence (yes, influence) his or her output remains of paramount importance.

To its credit, Edelman as an agency was transparent about who it represented when contacting bloggers for Wal-Mart. Yet, the firm only reached out to those bloggers sympathetic to Wal-Mart's point-of-view. Was this strategic or swarmy? In the end, according to Mr. Edelman, the effort
"...humanized the company and gave them the horizontal conversation: the peer-to-peer conversation, or word of mouth," he said. "The 'new thing' in all forms of marketing is that companies must understand that the person consumers trust most are persons most like themselves. What we're seeing is a devolution of authority."
So there you have it.

Monday, July 17, 2006

Turf Battle

A number of years ago, I found myself as the sole PR pro on a Center for Communication panel titled "PR Nation." The red flags should have gone up the moment I learned the names of my fellow panelists: Rhoda Karpatkin, then president of the Consumers Union, Randall Rothenberg, advertising pundit and then a columnist for Esquire, and moderator Stewart Ewen, who just published a decidedly anti-PR book called The Social History of Spin.

I knew Randy and had met Mr. Ewen, but always wanted to meet Ms. Karpatkin, a consumer advocacy legend for whom I had great admiration. (It's been a dream of mine to work for CU and its seminal magazine Consumer Reports.) Anyway, before the panel started, I approached Ms. Karpatkin to introduce myself. As soon as I mentioned my agency affiliation, she shot me a glinty look and made some snide comment. (I can't recall whether her hand recoiled when I extended mine.)

It seems that several years earlier, a DC operative for my firm ingenuously contacted Consumer Reports posing as a member of a "consumer organization" created expressly to advocate for a client on a particular issue. The ruse was discovered at the magazine and our firm's fate was sealed.

I recognized then, as I do now, that the practice known as "astroturfing" is perhaps our industry's biggest Achilles heel and one whose growth will stymie any efforts to build industry credibility and esteem in an age where transparent communications has established strong roots for growth.

My PR friend down under Paull Young dropped me a note over the weekend to alert me to an important new movement he and fellow blogger Trevor Cook started to draw attention and put an end to the insidious practice of astroturfing. (Even the anti-PR PR Watch took notice.)

Astroturfing's tentacles have spread far and wide. The practice doesn't just include organizations like The Discovery Institute, a front group created to introduce religion in schools. The Times just ran an expose on House Majority Leader John Boehner and his buoyant-sounding PAC "The Freedom Project," which is used to solicit corporate freebies and bolster his coffers.

In exposing astroturfing for what it is, we should be careful not to undermine the legitimate practice of "grassroots" or "grasstops" constituency-building whereby individuals and groups have a right to organize to create legislative change or simply draw attention to an issue. However, when our industry advises clients to create one-step-removed advocacy groups (with noble-sounding names), we are susceptible to (and deserved of) any criticism that befalls us. I hope Paull and Trevor's new campaign blossoms big time.

Friday, July 14, 2006

D & D

In an age where nothing -- I mean nothing - is too tastelessly shocking, an Italian magazine seems to have crossed the line. Chi has published a snapshot of Princess Di as she lay dying in a mangled car wreck.

Some years ago, I worked with the family of Dale Earnhardt to prevent the news media from gaining access to the legendary #3's autopsy photos. (Earnhardt also was killed in a car wreck -- on the last lap of the Daytona 500.)

Initially, it was unclear what these news organizations intended to do with the photos, but ultimately all (except a renegade website owner) said they'd keep the photos private. Even so, in recognition of the world wild web, a law was passed in Florida preventing unfettered access to such graphic and personal images. The law was challenged by First Amendment advocates who took it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear the case in effect allowing the Florida law to stand.

Like the Earnhardt case where the media tried to justify its interest in the pics as a means to determine the exact cause of death, "the Milan-based magazine published the snapshot along with excerpts from a new French book that purports to detail a criminal investigation of DianaÂ’s death."

In my mind, this is tasteless exploitation designed to sell more magazines on the newsstand. Expect more contrition from Chi's editor or publisher before too long.

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Restraint & RSS

What if the State of Israel had done nothing to retaliate for the bloody terrorist attacks and kidnappings on its northern and southern borders? What if it instead made a concerted effort to capture in words, pictures, sound and video the atrocities on its soil and syndicated them throughout the world?

Would this unexpected and contrarian response have garnered the kind of sympathy and support the Jewish state has long sought in the global court of public opinion? I wonder, especially considering the restraint showed during Operation Desert Storm when Iraqi scud missiles rained down on the Jewish State. That was then.

Now that news of this breach of Israel's sovereignty has faded into the rear view mirror of a continuous news cycle, we're left with images of a sustained Israeli offensive to fill the news hole for the foreseeable future. How can Israel ever expect to build support when its tanks are blasting through terrorist-infested neighborhoods?

Fighting fire with fire and brimstone would be a reasonable strategy if the terrorists cared about human life or were deterred by a strong Israeli response. They don't and they aren't. I still believe that public opinion can produce change, and that the ability to instantly disseminate words and pictures in this new media landscape can help propel the long-term result Israel desires.

With that said, one has to wonder what this country would do if state-sponsored terrorists from Mexico tunneled into San Diego and killed a handful of innocent Americans.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Barry's Bond

The extra base news of Barry Bonds' possible indictment on charges of perjury or tax evasion in yesterday's Daily News , prompted one columnist to astutely resurface the public relations implications for Major League Baseball.

He has a point. Not only is this a personal tragedy for the home run king*, but the League, which heretofore seemed willing to live with the asterisk in its vaunted record books, will now feel public pressure to do more, i.e., strip the title from the bogusly buff Bonds completely. Already, Mr. Bonds' conspicuous absence from MLB's All-Star Weekend's Home Run Derby and the Game itself set tongues-a-wagging.

Watch the court of public opinion (and a few acerbic sports columnists) compel MLB to take definitive action once-and-for-all against the steroidal slugger. Until that happens, it's encouraging to see Bud Selig continuing to avail himself to journalists' vexing questions on the issue(s) facing the league.
"Selig discussed those subjects, ranging from Barry Bonds to performance-enhancing substances to the next labor contract. 'There are always going to be problems,' Selig said."
Now wouldn't life be grand slam if no one bid up Mr. Bonds' ignominious 715th home run ball on eBay?

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

I Tube, You Tube, We Tube

I had the pleasure of sitting between master blogger Steve Rubel and master vlogger Andy Plesser on a panel this morning moderated by PR Week editor Julia Hood. Steve, who said he's very happy at Edelman, patiently shared his vision. Here is some of what I heard him say (with my comments below):

One day everyone will get their news and info via RSS.
If only my mother can get her RSS aggregator to work!
The paid wire services are "dead men walking" and will eventually disappear.
In checking on the number of releases posted on PR Newswire and BusinessWire every minute, I'm not sure those enterprises would agree with that assessment.
Blogging is just a very small part of the social media phenomenon. Virtual communities, e.g., Second Life and others, are ascendant and will soon be the next force to be reckoned with.
I saw the Harvard Business Review story too. All I can say to those avatars: Get a first life!
It was good hearing the latest from the low-key, but evangelical driver of the me2revolution. Steve deserves much credit for keeping (us) abreast of the digi-trends and tools that are irrevocably changing the practice of PR.

To my right sat Andy Plesser whose Beet.TV has garnered considerable attention of late. It was featured on typepad.com's home page just yesterday. Andy couldn't have been more effusive on the increasingly vital role digital video will play in the communications mix.

Andy ended the session by rallying the audience of university PR and development people to embrace this burgeoning online medium. In fact, we all agreed that this audience would derive particular benefit by encouraging its students (and faculty) to join the conversation.

Following the panel, Andy and I sauntered over to another floor of the Marriott Marquis to hear Brad Inman, CEO of turnhere.com, play out some of his company's work and also tout digital video as the medium of choice for marketers, communicators or anyone else hoping to use the Internet to build awareness for a product or service.

Brad's site is well organized and his company has hundreds of indy and video news producers on staff or on-call. He didn't, however, answer my question about the "distribution and marketing" (for an added charge) of the videos he produces. Obviously the videos are tagged and RSS-enabled so that they can pull people to his site. But does Turnhere push its video out to affinity sites, and if so, how does that work?

Brad did let on that TurnHere has deals with about.com and the Newsmarket, though he was unclear about how The Newsmarket's unique business model gibes with his. Finally, he turned us on to a couple of cool video-driven New York sites: Code.tv and Savory New York. These alone would have made the ride on the hotel's arcane elevator bank worth it.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Fire Alarmists

"...should this story also hit the mainstream press, we believe there is headline risk and potentially negative demand ramifications for Dell" was the warning a securities analyst sent to her clients after seeing reports of an exploding Dell laptop computer.

Two weeks ago on a PRSA-sponsored PR blogger panel, I had my head chewed off when I suggested that an issue doesn't become a crisis until it hits the mainstream media. I was not minimizing the capacity of citizen journalists to signal or fuel awareness of a potential problem, but rather pondering at what point (if at all) should companies take action to set the record straight.

Could AOL and Comcast have prevented the corporate agida sparked by the annoying customer service rep and sleepy technician, respectively, had they taken action when those stories were germinating in the blogosphere? It's hard to say.

Teresa Valdez Klein, who has commented on Dell's customer care troubles before on the Blog Business Summit Web site, compared Dell's public relations problems to those of Britney Spears. "The blogosphere latches onto the story and runs with it, drowning out anything good or redeeming that the company might say," she wrote.

Apparently Dell felt the analyst warning was unwarranted: Bob Pearson, vice president for corporate group communications at Dell, called Ms. Shaw's reaction "somewhat irresponsible."

I just wonder if a hyper-fragmented media, the 24/7 news cycle and an increasingly splintered audience together portend the end of crisis communications as we know it. In other words, can an issue build the necessary "legs" to penetrate a fickle and short-attention-spanned mass audience to do any permanent damage? Does time heal faster than ever? We're certain to hear more on this.

Two-Lane Highway

When we last left you before this sparkling New York weekend, we were talking about the PR machinations of the Beltway. Today, we learn where the Bush Administration's latest high-level defector is headed -- to Hill and Knowlton.

Former U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta, the only hold-out from the Clinton era to serve in the Bush Cabinet, has been named vice chairman of the WPP firm reporting to H&K CEO Paul Taafe.
"I was fortunate in my public-service career to participate in addressing some of the most complex domestic and global issues affecting trade and transportation, and to learn from some of the very best in developing programs and driving policies," says Mineta in a statement. "In our successes, I found that effective, straightforward communications played a key part."
I found it curious that when news of Mr. Mineta's departure first broke almost two weeks ago, there was no mention of his future employer. Was this a deliberate delay designed to minimize the recent criticism of the many Administration officials who cashed in on their Rolodexes after leaving the Bush White House? I wonder.

Presumably, Mr. Mineta's untarnished reputation will shield him. Ironically, the top candidate for Mr. Mineta's job? A lobbyist.

Friday, July 07, 2006

Ms. Smith Goes to Jefferson

So, Ms. Smith, how do you explain the hundred thousand dollars in cold cash stashed in your client's freezer?

Today, it's being reported that U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, the Congressman at the center of the storm over alleged Congressional corruption, Executive Branch power grab, FBI entrapment, and other sordid misdeeds in the Beltway, has retained a "crisis-seasoned PR aide" to "do a better job responding to the allegations against him."

Judy Smith, a lawyer herself, will enjoy attorney-client privilege as she hopes to "work her media contacts" to get out "the other side of the story." Her credentials include defending the reputations of Justice Clarence Thomas during the Anita Hill imbroglio at his confirmation hearings, the Saudi government post-9/11, the relatives of Rep. Gary Condit's mistress Chandra Levy, and her PR kingmaker client, Monica Lewinsky, whom she gloriously led past the hordes of reporters to testify against Bill Clinton.

There are some PR firms that are associated with the right side of the political spectrum, and others with the left. Most of the large full-serve PR firms have rainmakers and counselors on both sides of the ideological fence.

I can't figure out where Ms. Smith allegiances lie given her client history, but I do know that the famous words whispered by one Mark Felt have a role somewhere to play here, i.e., "just follow the money."

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Days of Future Past

As a dot-com (remember how au courant that term was?) columnist at the New York Post, Ben Silverman endured the constant barrage of PR pitches touting the latest and greatest stories (of which scant few were). Those were heady and headache-producing times for the reporters on the burgeoning tech beat.

Most simply poured through the PR platters and platitudes pushed on them, culling the more tantalizing tech tidbits to digest and report. In fact, the incoming pitches were so fast, furious and fraught with fiction that many scribes developed an aversion to the countless and clueless publicists suppliant to them for ink and airtime. Dot-com PR rivaled Party PR in its destructive affect on the reputation of the industry. It stings to this day.

Trolling online last night, I dugg up a site called NewPR/CrispyNews on which PR-related stories are posted and a social engine determines the story's ranking. (Is this the successor to the now defunct, link-based PubSub PR list that Constantin administered?)

Anyway, there was a curious piece posted by Mr. Silverman, whom I met a year ago at a blogger dinner in NYC. In it, the scribe who had little patience for pushy PR people back in the day, waxes on his first six months as a PR person for an electronic news release company.

The former mainstream journalist gives some good advice, but I was a little surprised (though not really) to see someone, who so breathlessly chronicled the coming digital age, extolling publicity generation as the key measure of success in the PR 2.0 world. It goes to show: Some things change. Some things will remain the same. I'm just glad to know that the astute Jonah Bloom predicts good tidings ahead.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Trendy Tools

The Times's David Leonhardt today pays homage to John Battelle and the SEM/SEO crowd by drawing attention to Google's new toogle, Google Trends, in a front page "Business" section column. (Even Mr. Battelle was blushing.)

If you had read Mr. Battelle's most recent tome The Search, which was released in proximity to another tale on Google, you likely will know a little something about intent-based marketing or "the database of intentions."

So now we have Technorati for tracking the conversation in the blogosphere, Nielsen Buzzmetrics, which gobbled up Intelliseek, Alexa, and others offering predictive tools for marketers (PR people presumably among them).

Some months ago, I had the good fortune of meetings the folks at the Aussie-founded company Hitwise, which approaches database trend analysis from a different direction than Google and promises "real-time competitive intelligence. It works through ISP's to collect data about site visits and referrals from a database of Internet users many times larger that the standard analyzers of online behavior.

The company also has some cool blogs. I especially like Bill Tanzer's periodic musings on the digital world. Here's his latest on MySpace.

Anyway, the point of this posting is that there's life for marketers beyond Google when it comes to measuring and acting on what's happening on the Internet. Can you ignore the search, software, and hardware (?) monopoly. Alas, the answer for the foreseeable future is a resounding no.


Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Independence Day

Working the fireworks in NYC. Hopefully, the thunderstorm will hold off.

Happy 4th everyone.

Peter

Monday, July 03, 2006

Blog Pruning

There are some in the PR field who advocate that every enterprise should embrace blogging. Let your employees blog. Why doesn't your CEO post? Use blogs to market your products and services. What about internal blogs and wikis? How prevalent is corporate blogging anyway?

Today, New York Times media columnist David Carr visits one of the world's most successful blogging-preneurs, Nick Denton of Gawker. Mr. Carr's editorial motivation: Denton's decision to put two of his "underperforming" blogs up for sale, and layoff some Gawker-land employees. In the column, Mr. Denton sanguinely notes,
"The world does not need more blogs," adding that if you count all the pages on MySpace, "there is approximately one reader for every blog out there."
This brings us back to the effusive PR consultants who prod their clients into the blogosphere with abandon. Let's face it: there are many individuals, institutions and industries that simply should not blog. If success is defined by building an audience (and authority), perhaps there are some subject areas that aren't worth the time of day?

I mean would people flock to a blog created by even the duckiest of insurance companies AFLAC (especially when its brand is riding high through traditional marketing means)?
"The barrier to entry in Internet media is low," Denton said. "The barrier to success is high...You have to have the discipline to recognize what isn't working and put your money and efforts into those sites that are."
Unlike Gawker, not all blogs are ad-supported. Many serve other important duties. Still, if the blog fails to attract any followers, perhaps it's time to hang it up.